Asus H61M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H61M-C  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '22 at 12:54
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 181
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 351
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia(10DE 098E) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 301.42
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RS7NV0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 84 48 43 44 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.8% Average
Read 258
Write 214
Mixed 229
SusWrite 68.7
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 18.5
88% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 77.8
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 27.3
52% 98.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 79%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
214GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 99 98 100 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 86
Write 86
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 100
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-C Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-C - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback