Asus PRIME H310M-D

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 23 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-D (all builds)
Memory	0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180319
Uptime	5.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '22 at 12:03
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$114 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 56.1 1-Core 111 2-Core 220 69% 129 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 609 63% 506 Pts	64-Core 630 39% 630 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.4% Poor	Lighting 35.9 Reflection 34.4 Parallax 36.9 29% 35.7 fps	MRender 25 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 16.9 21% 26.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 366 375 365 369 358 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 605 Write 545 Mixed 536 SusWrite 384 116% 518 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 82.3 4K Mixed 53.3 178% 59.8 MB/s	DQ Read 750 DQ Write 656 DQ Mixed 863 603% 757 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 302%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 774GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 142 152 113 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 114 Write 129 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 130 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FADP 1x8GB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 3.2 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-D Builds (Compare 659 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Sail boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-D

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	227x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	164x
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	69x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	20x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	22x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	17x
BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD 2x8GBCrucialBench 74%, 3,030 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $201

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16