Lenovo 90FB0039US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90FB0039US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3642
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '22 at 01:28
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 369
51% 378 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 460
Device(1642 1641) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 27.2
15% 24.2 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 20
19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 94 62 63 59 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 448
Write 361
Mixed 318
SusWrite 111
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 30.8
137% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 161
144% 214 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 95%
VendorCo Disk 3.0 2TB
28GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
7.92% Terrible
Read 32.1
Write 10.5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 9.9
16% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.92%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90FB0039US Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90FB0039US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback