MSI MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D54
MotherboardMSI MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54)  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '22 at 23:07
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 77.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 854
79% 660 Pts
64-Core 1,490
92% 1,490 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Lighting 44.5
Reflection 43.5
Parallax 41.1
36% 43 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 44.2
Splatting 29.2
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$99
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 842 426 425 432 429 428 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,566
Write 1,593
Mixed 1,200
SusWrite 497
272% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 65.1
220% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 1056
DQ Write 764
DQ Mixed 886
669% 902 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 202%
Great: 237%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$46
952GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 115 118 119 118 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 122
Write 121
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 116
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
219GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 145 147 147 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66% Good
Read 83.5
Write 80.8
Mixed 59
SusWrite 146
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
825GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 85 85 87 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 87.4
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 84.8
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
766GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 110 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 140
Write 144
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 108
133% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 52%
ST350041 8AS 500GB
276GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 22.9
Write 38
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 39.4
47% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905734-022.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 32.1
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 38.4
SC Mixed 28.5
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54) Builds (Compare 2,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $1,309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback