Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1640 x 2048 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '17 at 02:12
Run Duration56 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 86%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 36.3
2-Core 71.8
34% 53.8 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 272
24% 205 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ RevoDrive 350 PCIe 480GB-$396
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.50 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,652
Write 572
Mixed 863
225% 1,029 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 16.2
76% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 98
DQ Mixed 58.3
60% 98.7 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 129%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 54.8
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 45.4
137% 47.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 10
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback