Asus B85M-G R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85M-G R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '22 at 18:56
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 216
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 573
59% 475 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 38.1
30% 38.5 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 27.3
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 493
Write 354
Mixed 329
87% 392 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 32.5
136% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 112
115% 191 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
710GB free
Firmware: 00.0NS03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 104 104 105 105 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 95.3
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 102
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 62%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
459GB free
Firmware: 1003YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 115 114 115 115 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 116
Write 88.4
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 112
67% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-060.A00LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G R2.0 Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback