Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	22.2% Poor	Memory 29.8 1-Core 22.9 2-Core 44.8 20% 32.5 Pts	4-Core 84.7 8-Core 89 12% 86.8 Pts	64-Core 88 5% 88 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 076B) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.9.2 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.33% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 3 Parallax 2 1% 2.1 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.33% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHZ2160BJ G2 160GB 171 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: 891A SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 70 69 68 70 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 73.8 Write 72.9 Mixed 44.6 SusWrite 65 47% 64.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GU672203EP0200 Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBG/4G 5GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 667, 800 MHz 1024, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.33 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 3.1 8% 2.77 GB/s	Latency 256 16% 256 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
SSD340 128GBTranscend $88Bench 67%, 2,082 samples	2x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 3,182 samples	7x
ACR16D3LS1NBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 1,256 samples	5x
ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 6,155 samples	4x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28