HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8704
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '22 at 07:02
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 247
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 770
72% 597 Pts
64-Core 1,007
62% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
HP(103C 8789) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.8% Very good
Lighting 89.8
Reflection 87.4
Parallax 91
73% 89.4 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 77.6
Splatting 70.1
69% 87.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1006 512GB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 759 413 411 414 425 426 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 850
Write 1,179
Mixed 779
SusWrite 474
185% 821 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 61.3
206% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 930
DQ Write 642
DQ Mixed 772
580% 781 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 162%
Great: 214%
Adata SU 650 120GB
18GB free
Firmware: 4101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 277
Write 318
Mixed 274
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 18.1
69% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 112
84% 110 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 82%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
90GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 29 28 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 72.2
Write 27.8
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 28.1
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 59%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
112GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 41 41 40 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 39.6
Write 39.9
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 40.2
28% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 49%
ST ST2000DM001-1ER1 2TB
2TB free, PID 1e40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 38 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 29.3
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 38
43% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8ME-8X 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
44.8% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 11.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback