Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700E 28 User benchmarks, average bench 92% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	94% Outstanding	Memory 92.6 1-Core 128 2-Core 256 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 1,024 90% 768 Pts	64-Core 1,396 86% 1,396 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000 8,041 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.96 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	24.8% Poor	Lighting 31.7 Reflection 36 Parallax 28.3 26% 32 fps	MRender 27.5 Gravity 30.1 Splatting 26.2 23% 27.9 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$39 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1352 403 406 405 407 405 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	227% Outstanding	Read 1,994 Write 1,729 Mixed 1,328 SusWrite 563 313% 1,404 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 66.8 230% 85.8 MB/s	DQ Read 992 DQ Write 872 DQ Mixed 1,010 736% 958 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 227% Great: 302%
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB 6,756 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 234GB free Firmware: S4500105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 209 208 209 208 207 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 348 Write 364 Mixed 330 SusWrite 208 70% 313 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 90.3 4K Mixed 44.1 156% 56.1 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 210 164% 227 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 128%
WDC WUS721010ALE6L4 10TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 9.5TB free Firmware: VXGNW980 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 209 208 207 208 208 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 253 Write 264 Mixed 122 SusWrite 208 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 1.6 10% 4.3 MB/s	DQ Read 4.5 DQ Write 9.1 DQ Mixed 6.3 5% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 2x16GB 546 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.6% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 13.9 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 18.4 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-10700EIntelBench 92%, 28 samples	5x
Core i9-10900KIntel $440Bench 100%, 107,269 samples	2x
Pentium Gold G6400IntelBench 68%, 3,112 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 39,219 samples	4x
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 24%, 8,041 samples	2x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $39Bench 234%, 87,206 samples	4x
TM242S3STTLC-256G 256GBBench 55%, 2 samples	2x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	1x

RAM
HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 80%, 546 samples	3x
CIR-S4DUSW2608G 1x8GBUnknownBench 44%, 3 samples	2x
9905701-132.A00G 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 818 samples	1x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $39

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16