Asrock B85M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B85M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '22 at 19:14
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.6% Below average
Memory 17.9
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 166
44% 89.5 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 176
35% 239 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 4.2
3% 4 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 152 152 131 103 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.6% Poor
Read 164
Write 104
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 129
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 9.7
32% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 23.3
DQ Mixed 21.1
16% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 102%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
48GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 278 231 238 216 224 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 346
Mixed 320
SusWrite 256
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 51.7
170% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 325
250% 341 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
383GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 367 358 329 358 420 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 389
Mixed 340
SusWrite 366
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 50.6
164% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 360
256% 324 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
ST1000DM 003-1SB10C 1TB
839GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 22 23 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 22.5
Write 19.2
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 22.2
28% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
52% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.7
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 337
12% 337 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro4 - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $384
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback