Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5095 1,699 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	34.6% Below average	Memory 25.1 1-Core 22.2 2-Core 151 30% 66.1 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 246 34% 251 Pts	64-Core 255 16% 255 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	1.61% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 3.3 2% 3.57 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.1 0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.61% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qunion 256GB 256GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0803A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 53 47 52 51 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 389 Write 332 Mixed 125 SusWrite 81.4 51% 232 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 7.3 34% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 1.8 65% 153 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x6GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.2% Average	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 17.7 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 285 14% 285 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	21x
Celeron N5095AIntelBench 40%, 431 samples	1x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	22x

RAM
53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x6GBMicronBench 48%, 69 samples	16x
53D512M64D4RQ-046 1x8GBMicronBench 37%, 39 samples	3x
53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x8GBMicronBench 39%, 25 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16