PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 DELUXE (all builds) |
Memory | 10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121031 |
Uptime | 1.6 Days |
Run Date | Feb 21 '22 at 09:20 |
Run Duration | 176 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
67.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$105
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 71 75 74 75 75 MB/s
|
58.7%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
896GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 78 76 77 76 75 MB/s
|
76.4%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate One Touch HDD 5TB
1TB free, PID ab5c
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 91 91 92 92 91 MB/s
|
46.9%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905458-020.A00LF 9905458-020.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
45.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 586x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 161x |
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 106x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 76x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 60x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 60x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $713 |