MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '22 at 21:11
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 107
53% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 243
28% 220 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.6% Below average
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 45.1
Parallax 48.4
31% 44 fps
MRender 41.7
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 30.8
29% 36.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 426
Write 274
Mixed 289
73% 330 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 31.2
104% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 53.1
DQ Mixed 3.8
27% 65.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
45GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 155 137 128 156 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 138
Write 128
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 143
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
667, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.3% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.3
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback