Packard imedia S3800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPackard imedia S3800  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard FIH57
Memory2.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100120
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '22 at 19:16
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 69
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 126
54% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 180
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310
Sapphire(174B 3100) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.29% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.6
1% 0.87 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.29%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 66 70 73 63 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 76.9
Write 89.4
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 67.5
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
28GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 8.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 8.8
Mixed 14.4
SusWrite 8.6
18% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.5
110% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 28%
Sony Storage Media 16GB
3GB free, PID 09c2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 23 22 23 22 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 21.2
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 21
27% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba ACR256X64D3U1333C9 ACR128X64D3U1333C9 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 ACR128X64D3U1333C9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
29.5% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 12.9
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S3800 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback