Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T6570 2,846 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Memory 70.6 1-Core 33.5 2-Core 65 38% 56.4 Pts	4-Core 64 8-Core 64.8 9% 64.4 Pts	64-Core 65.2 4% 65.2 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 40%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS723232L9A360 320GB 1,522 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: FC4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 54 68 67 69 72 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 82.1 Write 76.2 Mixed 45.1 SusWrite 66.2 50% 67.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 4.4 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T6570IntelBench 34%, 2,846 samples	4x
Core2 Duo T6670IntelBench 35%, 2,094 samples	1x
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 2,791 samples	6x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
SKC600256G 256GBKingstonBench 102%, 6,756 samples	1x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80