Daewoo H81H3-I

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDaewoo H81H3-I  (all builds)
MotherboardDAEWOO H81H3-I
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '22 at 09:25
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 224
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 544
55% 448 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Geonix 120GB 120GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 66 43 56 60 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 462
Write 147
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 56.6
38% 176 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 8.8
84% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 33.4
DQ Mixed 15.6
32% 67.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 73%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
488GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 90 91 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 122
Write 104
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 91.6
73% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
168% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Kingston ACR512X64D3U16C11G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 20.5
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81H3-I Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Daewoo H81H3-I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $41
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback