Acer Aspire E1-431

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-431  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA40_HC
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '22 at 03:44
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1000M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 46.2
2-Core 93.8
48% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 88
8-Core 71.8
11% 79.9 Pts
64-Core 67.7
4% 67.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0731) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P180831a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 3.1 82 64 30 1.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 437
Write 70.7
Mixed 199
SusWrite 30.2
40% 184 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 23.5
58% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37
160GB free
Firmware: AM001K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 102 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 98.5
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 103
60% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-CK0 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 10.4
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-431 Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-431

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback