Asrock H97M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H97M  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140430
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '22 at 21:37
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 188
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 352
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 1060 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 46.6
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 59.9
38% 48.4 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 47
Splatting 26.9
29% 36 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 215GB
200GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 364 363 361 362 363 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 368
Mixed 325
SusWrite 362
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 41.4
145% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 196
176% 263 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 100%
Great: 127%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
688GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 126 131 142 145 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 154
Write 142
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 139
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD380D81-1600C Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.3% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 17.8
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 19.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H97M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback