Dimotion-pcdn6v5 PCDN6V5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDimotion-pcdn6v5 PCDN6V5  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Z77M-D3H
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131231
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '22 at 18:35
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 180
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 504
53% 425 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2340 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 146
Parallax 133
109% 137 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 135
Splatting 122
100% 122 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 271 297 274 249 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
66% Good
Read 459
Write 311
Mixed 265
SusWrite 232
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 21.7
82% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 84.1
DQ Mixed 131
111% 169 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
765GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 90 90 90 92 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 88.6
Write 92.6
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 89.3
65% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-442.A00LF 9905403-442.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PCDN6V5 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Dimotion-pcdn6v5 PCDN6V5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $583
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback