Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory38GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 38GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R670-2  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2618-C1
Memory35.9 GB free of 38 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920x1200x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '22 at 18:25
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 151
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 457
46% 374 Pts
64-Core 1,022
63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.96
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 19.9
18% 19.6 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 16
16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lsilogic Logical Volume 478GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 201 96 55 73 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 378
Write 372
Mixed 344
SusWrite 137
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 15.6
51% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 81.5
DQ Write 96.8
DQ Mixed 86.6
66% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 52%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
22GB free
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 98 102 96 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 90.8
Write 42.6
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 95.1
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
48GB free
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 100 100 97 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 70.4
Write 36
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 97.6
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 70%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
10GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.9 5.1 4.6 5 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Read 26.6
Write 2.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 4.9
10% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 38GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 17.2
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.3
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R670-2 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback