Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemXen HVM domU  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.8 GB free of 15.9844 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '22 at 13:45
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 109
44% 73.9 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 294
30% 241 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID K160Q
Nvidia(10DE 113B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 348.27
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5
Parallax 4
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 4.1
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xensrc PVDISK 268GB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 165 163 161 167 162 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.5% Poor
Read 222
Write 184
Mixed 203
SusWrite 162
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 7.9
25% 7.37 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 23.5
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 9.4
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback