TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 10AGS0HA00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10AGS0HA00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 23:33
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$38
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 127
61% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 260
27% 215 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 51.1%
 Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 8646) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 14.7
13% 13.7 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 15.6
11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 12.1%
 Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-128-G2 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 349 216 98 142 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 403
Write 43.9
Mixed 172
SusWrite 198
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 40.9
142% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 188
149% 206 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 81.8%
 Great: 97%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: SAJ20103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 407 386 379 403 406 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 395
Mixed 385
SusWrite 392
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 32.8
134% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 119
131% 216 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 93.9%
 Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5595-005.A00LF 99U5595-005.A00LF 9905595-011.A00LF 9905595-011.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.2% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 10AGS0HA00 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AGS0HA00

CPU
Core i3-4170Intel  $20Bench 57%, 48,178 samples4x
Core i5-4670Intel  $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples2x
Core i5-4570Intel  $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples2x
GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples2x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples2x
Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples2x
SSD
SU650 240GBAdata  $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples4x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples3x
SSDPR-CL100-120-G3 120GBBench 63%, 1,092 samples2x
RAM
9905402-670.A00LF 99U5474-038.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 28%, 3 samples2x
FLFE85F-C8KM9 1337 FLFE85F-C8KM9 1337 FLFE85F-C8KM9 1337 FLFE85F-B8KL9 8GBUnknownBench 52%, 2 samples2x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback