Biostar TA780G M2+

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar TA780G M2+ (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080618
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '22 at 22:26
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Processor model unknown 224 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Memory 51.5 1-Core 45.2 2-Core 89.4 38% 62 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 170 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 167 10% 167 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% PwrHis(1787 2003) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	4.82% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 8.9 Parallax 1.9 5% 5.57 fps	MRender 5.8 Gravity 3.6 Splatting 7.7 5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.82% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Revuahn 900G Blue 120GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1211A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 65 36 33 46 30 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.4% Below average	Read 235 Write 195 Mixed 194 SusWrite 65.1 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 14.5 74% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 23.7 DQ Write 73.9 DQ Mixed 17.3 22% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 84%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270 9,828 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: ML6OA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 107 111 107 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 118 Write 127 Mixed 67.8 SusWrite 108 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 8.7 22% 7.87 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 155 26% 155 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TA780G M2+ Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TA780G M2+

CPU
Phenom II X4 925AMD $150Bench 51%, 5,211 samples	1x
Processor model unknownAMDBench 45%, 224 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	2x

SSD
900G Blue 120GBRevuahnBench 64%, 74 samples	1x
SS D 256GBLexarBench 61%, 24 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $150

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16