Lenovo 20HJS56300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive494% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20HJS56300  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HJS56300
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 19:23
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 226
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 605
61% 497 Pts
64-Core 609
38% 609 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2200
Legend(17AA 2251) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1377 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.09
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.6
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 31.7
19% 30.3 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 23.6
21% 26 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 237GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1643 2010 2010 2026 2026 1986 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
494% Outstanding
Read 3,689
Write 2,015
Mixed 1,948
SusWrite 1950
534% 2,401 MB/s
4K Read 160
4K Write 225
4K Mixed 177
588% 187 MB/s
DQ Read 1,137
DQ Write 854
DQ Mixed 965
730% 985 MB/s
Poor: 267%
This bench: 494%
Great: 483%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C15S4/16G 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 27.3
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20HJS56300 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20HJS56300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback