Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory249.1 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 14:43
Run Duration381 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 72.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 299
91% 173 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 1,110
99% 835 Pts
64-Core 2,992
185% 2,992 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
MSI(1462 397B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 130
Parallax 125
114% 132 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 102
Splatting 97.5
92% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd_black SN750 S 1TB
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2574 2563 2568 2551 2052 199 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Wd_black SN750 S 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 7112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2635 2616 2611 2531 2530 2536 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Amd-raid Array 1 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8097 8147 8260 7940 5979 5971 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
707% Outstanding
Read 3,193
Write 7,830
Mixed 2,916
SusWrite 7,399
1,218% 5,334 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 88.6
291% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 873
DQ Write 765
DQ Mixed 812
611% 817 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 707%
Great: 434%
Amd-raid Array 4 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1806 1799 1807 1802 1814 1807 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,358
Write 1,796
Mixed 1,077
SusWrite 1,806
342% 1,509 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 44.9
204% 89.2 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 733
DQ Mixed 537
421% 570 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 252%
Great: 805%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMG128GX4M4E3200C16 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
165% Outstanding
MC Read 68.2
MC Write 47.7
MC Mixed 82.1
189% 66 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 39.3
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 165%
Great: 190%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback