Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 80.5 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 190 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 580 58% 473 Pts	64-Core 666 41% 666 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.03% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 1.2 3% 3.43 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 4 Splatting 3 3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.03% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Netac 512GB 512GB 1,541 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 434GB free Firmware: 3A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 44 43 44 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 425 Write 39.3 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 48 31% 145 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 3.2 42% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 95%
Netac 512GB 512GB 1,541 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 434GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 273 Write 59.6 Mixed 43.7 27% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 9.5 16% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron-002C 36JSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 2x16GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 17.8 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 11.6 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	74x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16