Lenovo 82AS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 82AS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2160 x 1350 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '22 at 15:14
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 259
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 307
49% 350 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F18) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 5.5
4% 4.9 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ1T0HALB-000L2 1TB
897GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AL2QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 559 588 651 1088 668 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,154
Write 1,152
Mixed 1,020
SusWrite 672
225% 999 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 67.2
226% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 513
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 442
313% 404 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 175%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 12.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82AS Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82AS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback