HP ProDesk 400 G2 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E9
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '22 at 14:48
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 198
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 396
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Asus(1043 04B3) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 21 24 23 41 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 9.9
Write 51.4
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 34.9
27% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 13%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Kingston KP223C-ELD 6GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback