HP ZBook 15 G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook 15 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8275
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '22 at 08:25
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 551
59% 471 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1200
HP(103C 8277) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 17.7
14% 16.9 fps
MRender 21.5
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 14
14% 18.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BTO 512G NGFF SSD 512GB
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW2O1219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 324 295 233 290 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 448
Write 242
Mixed 316
SusWrite 305
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 9.4
104% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 20
74% 160 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.2% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 15 G4 Builds (Compare 869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback