Jginyue X79M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardJginyue X79M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 23:25
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 96
2-Core 184
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 553
56% 451 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.2.1
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.1% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 81.1
46% 66.1 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 45
46% 57.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 78 86 79 84 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 146
Write 115
Mixed 134
SusWrite 82.9
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 25.1
97% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 108
86% 121 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
241GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 112
Write 104
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 96.8
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 19
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79M-PLUS Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Jginyue X79M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback