HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Desktop M01-F1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87D6
Memory6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210917
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 21:54
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 294
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 583
8-Core 953
94% 768 Pts
64-Core 1176
73% 1176 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 87D6) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.26
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 31.8
18% 23.8 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 21.6
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW010T8H 1TB
673GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1117 984 646 99 335 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,098
Write 1,072
Mixed 922
SusWrite 546
204% 910 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 68.4
227% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 622
DQ Write 819
DQ Mixed 457
418% 633 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 180%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE M378A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
64% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.7
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop M01-F1xxx Builds (Compare 1,121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback