Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	Memory 30.6 1-Core 20.8 2-Core 39.1 19% 30.2 Pts	4-Core 75.5 8-Core 86.7 11% 81.1 Pts	64-Core 81.9 5% 81.9 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 30C9) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.32% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 2.6 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 2 Splatting 1.7 2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.32% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 50 51 56 57 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 69.9 Write 71.6 Mixed 86.7 SusWrite 54.2 16% 70.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 9.3 31% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 79 DQ Write 65 DQ Mixed 63.5 50% 69.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF 1x8GB 1,104 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 6.2 19% 6.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 251 16% 251 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	4x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	4x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
9905428-417.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 1,104 samples	1x
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GBRAMAXELBench 25%, 10,170 samples	1x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	1x

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $38

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16