Huananzhi Gaming TF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHuananzhi Gaming TF  (all builds)
MotherboardHuananzhi X99-TF Gaming
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 15:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 78
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 158
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 741
65% 553 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 290X
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.3% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 88.4
54% 74.4 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 60.5
Splatting 42.2
44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0828A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 985 959 1002 1021 1003 971 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,192
Write 1,004
Mixed 870
SusWrite 990
228% 1,014 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 25.8
150% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 868
DQ Write 709
DQ Mixed 492
449% 690 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 187%
Great: 291%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
108% Outstanding
MC Read 47.7
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 38.6
123% 43 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 108%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Gaming TF Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Huananzhi Gaming TF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback