Dell Precision 7920 Rack

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Precision 7920 Rack  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06WXJT
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 09:21
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4214R
CPU1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 52.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 200
64% 119 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 767
68% 577 Pts
64-Core 2,984
185% 2,984 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 78%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WUS3BA138C7P3E3 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0112001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 929 944 925 837 884 1195 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 362
Write 1,268
Mixed 522
SusWrite 952
178% 776 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 46.7
206% 89.2 MB/s
DQ Read 953
DQ Write 711
DQ Mixed 787
601% 817 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 172%
Great: 818%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA81GR7CJR8N-XN 4x8GB
4 of 24 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.1% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 16.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 7920 Rack Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

System: Dell Precision 7920 Rack

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback