Lenovo 23245QU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 23245QU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 23245QU
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 07:34
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 149
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 209
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21FA) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.9
3% 2.97 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 99 56 33 46 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 469
Write 402
Mixed 352
SusWrite 110
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 11
90% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 15.6
64% 136 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD73I1B1674EU 04CB EL73I1B1672ZU 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23245QU Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 23245QU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $349
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback