Asus Rampage II GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Rampage II GENE  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 03:14
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 28.8
2-Core 121
50% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 501
41% 358 Pts
64-Core 657
41% 657 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 65%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Asus(1043 886D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 473.04
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 111
Parallax 125
104% 121 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 120
Splatting 95.1
93% 116 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 192 193 124 196 215 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.9% Above average
Read 236
Write 234
Mixed 208
SusWrite 185
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 31.5
84% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 41.8
DQ Write 87.5
DQ Mixed 32.7
34% 54 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 136%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
8.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 41 35 23 34 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 99.7
Write 68.7
Mixed 53
SusWrite 33.9
79% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 1.5
360% 4.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 1.5
419% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 103%
USB 3.0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 22 28 19 31 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 83
Write 55.3
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 26.8
65% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 63%
USB 3.0 4TB
1TB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.4 4.7 3.5 4.4 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 60.6
Write 59.5
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 4
48% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 18.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage II GENE Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Rampage II GENE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback