Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 38.1 1-Core 53.6 2-Core 98 36% 63.2 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 204 23% 180 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E39 A002) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9837 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.07% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 2.5 2% 2.5 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 4 3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.07% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 114GB free Firmware: UJ450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 163 147 147 146 153 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 362 Write 257 Mixed 257 SusWrite 176 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 33.5 4K Mixed 10.6 47% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 80.9 DQ Mixed 41.4 46% 79.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 55%
SDXC Card 128GB 9,908 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 119GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 25 26 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 24.9 Write 24.4 Mixed 22.9 SusWrite 25.6 34% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.1 78% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB 5,404 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 12 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	6x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	6x

SSD
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TBBench 107%, 26,659 samples	1x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	1x
M.2 SSD 256GBSpccBench 68%, 1,384 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 2x2GBABCDBench 19%, 5,404 samples	6x