HP HPE-500y

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP HPE-500y  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110118
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 15:51
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T-$165
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 46.8
2-Core 93.4
49% 74.4 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 227
25% 195 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SQ500S37480G 480GB
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 140 137 136 137 137 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.9% Below average
Read 205
Write 192
Mixed 191
SusWrite 130
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 13.6
59% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 31.3
DQ Mixed 47.5
41% 63.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 84%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 105 136 136 137 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 143
Write 137
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 116
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.6
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 9.3
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-500y Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-500y

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback