Toshiba SATELLITE L755

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L755 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Base Board Product Name
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110215
Uptime	13.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '22 at 14:40
Run Duration	263 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	51% Above average	Memory 77.5 1-Core 57.7 2-Core 89.3 49% 74.8 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 147 20% 146 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M 9,032 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FC50) 1GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.25 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	2.24% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 0.8 2% 2.57 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 2.3 2% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.24% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ezcool S280 240GB 722 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: EZ2020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 9.8 20 24 31 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 388 Write 328 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 22.5 42% 194 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 25.7 4K Mixed 8.8 42% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 17 46% 98.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 105%
Toshiba MK6465GSXN 640GB 1,578 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 30GB free Firmware: GH101M SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 15 27 30 36 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 52.6 Write 47.5 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 28.9 29% 38.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.5% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 11.7 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11.2 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 85.3 47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE L755 Builds (Compare 508 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L755

CPU
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	133x
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	74x
Core i3-2310MIntel $80Bench 46%, 25,542 samples	61x

GPU
GeForce GT 525MNvidiaBench 2%, 9,032 samples	262x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	112x
GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 5,654 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	45x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	40x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16