bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory35.9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 35.9GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory4.3 GB free of 35.874 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime11 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 13:46
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6226
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 193
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 821
72% 615 Pts
64-Core 822
51% 822 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 183GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 193 210 206 217 250 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Microsoft Virtual Disk 601GB
73GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 190 192 202 214 200 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.6% Above average
Read 386
Write 366
Mixed 368
SusWrite 201
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 14.4
51% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 321
238% 321 MB/s
Microsoft Virtual Disk 290GB
209GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 194 205 207 208 210 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.7% Above average
Read 394
Write 353
Mixed 368
SusWrite 204
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 13.9
50% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 299
216% 282 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 88%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 54GB
11GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 388
Write 352
Mixed 374
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 14.2
49% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 451
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 338
247% 329 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 100%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
111GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 195 197 200 204 235 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 402
Write 369
Mixed 365
SusWrite 206
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 14.3
51% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 292
218% 294 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 35GB
0, 0 MHz
3968, 32767 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 50.3
MC Mixed 42.3
128% 44.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 107%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback