MSI MS-7A59

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Z270 Gaming Codex X3 (MS-B913)
MotherboardMSI MS-7A59  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170113
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '22 at 21:25
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 138
2-Core 265
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 759
76% 619 Pts
64-Core 759
47% 759 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 113
Parallax 104
86% 108 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 104
Splatting 101
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 875
Write 581
Mixed 601
152% 686 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 49.7
184% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 327
272% 381 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 157%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
121GB free
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 873
Write 576
Mixed 568
149% 672 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 49.5
186% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 549
DQ Mixed 312
266% 379 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 157%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
217GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,612
Write 55.2
Mixed 110
469% 2,259 MB/s
4K Read 871
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 6.9
1,330% 294 MB/s
Poor: 89% Great: 133%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
109GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 126
Mixed 61.9
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
177% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 113%
USB 3.0 Flash Drive 16GB
2GB free, PID 0001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 95.2
Write 23.2
Mixed 21.1
45% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
21% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 22%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,538
Write 30.5
Mixed 84.6
1,496% 2,218 MB/s
4K Read 856
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3.1
3,362% 287 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7A59 Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI MS-7A59

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $576
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback