Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121226
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '22 at 20:16
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 168
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 527
54% 435 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
EVGA(3842 4663) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 166
Parallax 162
143% 168 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 137
Splatting 116
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 127%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 222 227 213 221 223 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 353
Write 339
Mixed 329
SusWrite 222
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 31.9
110% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 220
166% 223 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 137%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
477GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 216 209 215 211 211 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 408
Write 432
Mixed 306
SusWrite 211
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 30.6
108% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 174
149% 212 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 107%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
238GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 219 224 230 228 227 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 350
Write 444
Mixed 298
SusWrite 225
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 31.7
113% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 332
248% 328 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 23.8
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,078
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback