HP G62 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP G62 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 143A
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111109
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '22 at 00:23
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 53.1
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 124
47% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 150
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
HP(103C 143D) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.07 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Y200901a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 147 106 116 105 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.2% Above average
Read 237
Write 230
Mixed 232
SusWrite 133
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 25.9
87% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 166
125% 166 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
274GB free
Firmware: 0005HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 60 61 62 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 47.8
Write 50
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 61.2
34% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.2
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G62 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP G62 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback