Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 22:12
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 197
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 613
59% 486 Pts
64-Core 788
49% 788 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.9% Very good
Lighting 99
Reflection 140
Parallax 93.1
81% 111 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 92.1
Splatting 78.9
73% 90.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 11 9.4 77 57 1.2 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.3% Poor
Read 161
Write 35.6
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 33.4
16% 73 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 6.4
32% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 59.2
53% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 85%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
138GB free
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 104 92 64 93 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 382
Write 364
Mixed 363
SusWrite 147
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 1.1
45% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 1.3
67% 161 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
248GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 156 154 153 155 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 4
Write 121
Mixed 30
SusWrite 154
56% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.8% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 25.7
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $69

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $342
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback