Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9300-$70 3,287 User benchmarks, average bench 38% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Memory 70 1-Core 37.8 2-Core 77.8 41% 61.9 Pts	4-Core 75.7 8-Core 78.5 10% 77.1 Pts	64-Core 77.9 5% 77.9 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 140M 885 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 20D8) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 0.2 0% 0.63 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB 12,396 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 715GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415020RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 96 79 104 109 107 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.3% Below average	Read 119 Write 101 Mixed 89.2 SusWrite 100 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 20 56% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 98.1 DQ Write 95.5 DQ Mixed 87 68% 93.5 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4.1 13% 4.47 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 101 39% 101 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 19%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T9300Intel $70Bench 38%, 3,287 samples	3x

GPU
Quadro NVS 140MNvidiaBench 1%, 885 samples	3x

SSD
S3 1T00 1TBSandiskBench 95%, 12,396 samples	2x

RAM
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	2x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $70

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16