Acer Aspire E1-522

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-522  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire E1-522
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130710
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 17:45
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
29.2% Poor
Memory 39
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 58.4
26% 41.6 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 119
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
Acer(1025 076B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3
Parallax 2.7
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA15.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 274 195 196 180 203 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60% Above average
Read 198
Write 104
Mixed 185
SusWrite 228
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 27.5
96% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 177
137% 187 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60%
Great: 100%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
732GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 135 137 136 133 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 131
Write 131
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 135
144% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160BJ.M8F Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 5
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-522 Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-522

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback