Asrock H67M-GE/HT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H67M-GE/HT  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 14:18
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 32,871,956 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 179
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 437
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0122) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 1.7
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M7VC 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 206 180 207 190 220 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 475
Write 418
Mixed 322
SusWrite 212
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 26.9
89% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 174
150% 220 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600G DDR3 1600G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M-GE/HT Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H67M-GE/HT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback