Clevo W870CU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemClevo W870CU  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO W870CU
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20100927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 11:21
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 820-$119
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 43.9
2-Core 102
50% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 178
17% 139 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Clevo(1558 8687) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
8.99% Terrible
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 10.8
10% 11.4 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 7.7
7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.99%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 480GB-$81
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 218 221 223 235 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.9% Average
Read 233
Write 226
Mixed 213
SusWrite 217
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 16.7
57% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 139
120% 176 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5173EB0-YK0 029E CMSO2GX3M1A1333C9 6GB
1600, 1334 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.4% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W870CU Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo W870CU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback