Asus UX32VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 79% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus UX32VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX32VD
Memory6.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 05:42
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 79%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3517U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 74
2-Core 127
57% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 179
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3570 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 139
Parallax 149
114% 143 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 120
Splatting 111
107% 134 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 109%
Great: 123%
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 1507) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.39% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 2.4
2% 3.13 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.39%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
654GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401120RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 368 354 343 386 383 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 456
Write 422
Mixed 364
SusWrite 359
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 31.6
99% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 234
187% 266 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 118%
Adata HV620S 2TB
391GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 21 20 19 20 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 63.9
Write 74
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 28.5
46% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
109% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 70%
I-O DATA HDPX-UTA 2TB
387GB free, PID 0159
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 76 51 42 37 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 119
Write 68.6
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 57.7
96% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 48%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
76GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 97 94 93 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 122
Write 76
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 93.9
116% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.8
235% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD31600C118GVS Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.8% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 9.7
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX32VD Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX32VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback