Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$185 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 98.6 2-Core 190 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 455 52% 408 Pts	64-Core 463 29% 463 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B1) CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Lighting 67 Reflection 69.8 Parallax 62.7 55% 66.5 fps	MRender 65.8 Gravity 69.4 Splatting 63.4 54% 66.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ortial SSD 128GB 204 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1130A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 30 42 36 46 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 353 Write 302 Mixed 275 SusWrite 43.2 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 77.4 4K Mixed 16.7 97% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 22.2 30% 52.6 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 145%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 218GB free Firmware: JPFOA3BF SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 37 44 40 47 49 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 72.8 Write 64.4 Mixed 39.6 SusWrite 46.6 41% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR5040MM58F9F1600 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB RMR5040MM58F9F1600 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.5% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.7 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 9.9 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

SSD
SSD 128GBOrtialBench 77%, 204 samples	9x
Solid State Disk 240GBSpccBench 71%, 15,968 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
RMR5040MM58F9F1600 RMR5040MM58F9F1600 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 21 samples	5x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	2x
NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG RMR5040MM58F9F1600 NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG RMR5040MM58F9F1600 12GBNanyaBench 51%, 2 samples	2x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $304